Craft Victoria Craft Victoria

TABS

Fabrications: Text and textiles conference

A conference at Wollongong university looks at the links between text and textile crafts in the colonial experience.


One of the conference team, Dorothy Jones, talks about her role
 I am only one of four researchers working on this project.  Diana Wood-Conroy is analysing what happened with the setting up in the 1970s of a silk-screen workshop, Tiwi Designs on Bathurst Island.  Anne Collett is writing about Pauline Johnson, a Canadian First Nations Poet (early 20cth) for whom buckskin and wampum were important images both in her poems and in the public performances where she recited her work.  Paul Sharrad is researching a Kashmir shawl woven with a map of Srinigar, held in the Australian National Gallery and is also working on tapa cloth in the Pacific.  I myself an writing about the embroidery, designed by Kay Lawrence and worked by Embroiderer’s Guild members throughout Australia, which hangs in Parliament House with particular reference to the historical and literary implications of its design.
Can you identify a moment or example that suggested the possibility of a connection between trade, text and textiles?

I doubt whether any of us could identify an exact moment or example that suggested the possibility of a connection between trade, text and textiles.  As an amateur embroiderer I have always had an interest in textiles and in recent years have been particularly interested in correspondences between textiles and text.  Metaphors relating the two are common place – ‘to spin a yarn’, ‘to follow a thread of narrative’, ‘to embroider a tale’.  All over the world there are long traditions of incorporating text into narrative.  In western culture, generations of little girls learnt their alphabet through embroidering it on samples along with edifying precepts and biblical texts.  Islam also has a long tradition of embroidering or weaving Koranic texts into cloth.  There are only two examples of many.  My own interest in feminism has also led me to consider ways in which textiles and the work of producing and embellishing them have traditionally been used to circumscribe women in various ways.  Even in Homer’s Odyssey the queen Penelope is told to leave business of state to men and get back to her weaving.  But women have also used textiles and textile allusions as a way of asserting their own point of view and subverting ideas of approved female behaviour.  There is an interesting exploration of the potentially subversive aspects of quilting in Margaret Atwood’s novel Alias Grace.  Some women novelists have represented the woman who works with textiles as an image of the woman artist.  Jessica Anderson does this in her novel Tirra Lirra By the River and Kate Grenville in The Idea of Perfection.

Images of thread and weaving have also been used to symbolise social connectedness and were often used to signify the ties of empire.  Because cloth has been a principal trading commodity for centuries, it has been closely bound up with the economics of political domination and imperialism.  Colonialism intervened massively in processes of cloth production causing severe cultural dislocation among colonised peoples, for whom creation and exchange of cloth was crucially important in determining patterns of social relationship.  In India the British undermined the centuries old cotton textile industry to ensure the advantage of Lancashire cotton manufacture, so that India was eventually transformed from the world’s most advanced producer of cotton textiles to an exporter of raw cotton and an importer of cloth.  This led Gandhi to lead a revival of hand-spinning in India, so that the resulting cotton fabric, khadi, became accepted garb for asserting Indian national identity.  Amitav Ghosh’s novel The Circle of Reason uses accounts of cloth-making as a way of exploring the situation of India post-independence, and in Salman Rushdie’s novel Shame shawl-making becomes a subversive practice.

What do the three share as colonial practices? Were they bound together by missionary ideals?

Trade, text and textiles were bound together to some extent by missionary practices, though I don’t think the links between them were solely due to missionaries, though the latter were frequently witting or unwitting agents of colonialism and imperial trading interests.  Missionaries were particularly intent on ensuring indigenous peoples conformed to the gender expectations of middle-class English people.  When they found men involved in working with textiles, for example, they made every effort to change this, insisting it was women’s work, often in this way destabilising the social relationships existing within indigenous communities.  Sometimes, however, textile practices introduced by missionaries became incorporated into indigenous culture in interesting ways.  A good example are the quilts or ti vae vae made in various Pacific countries.  Women, taught quilting by missionaries, adapted traditional quilting patterns to express their own familiar world, and these quilts took on some of the ceremonial functions originally associated with tapa cloth.  Paul Sharrad tells me that in Tahiti biblical passages were printed on tapa cloth.

What do you see the role of contemporary craft, given the link between craft and colonialism? 

The role of contemporary craft is an immensely wide topic.  Everyone living here is influenced (whether consciously or not) by the fact that Australia was once part of the British Empire and by the way its former colonial status inevitably pervades our culture.  Only a few craft practitioners are likely to make direct reference to this in their work, but their sensibilities will nevertheless have been shaped by it.  Awareness of postcoloniality involves an awareness of difference and the complexity of the many strands of people and cultures which have helped form contemporary Australia.  A craft worker’s own background will inevitably determine not only the theme of his or her work but also its process and concept. For example, an indigenous community, like the Tiwi on Bathurst Island, works from a very different understanding of the meaning of craft to that held by most white Australian practitioners.

Given the academic nature of conferences, what might a craft practitioner add that a theorist cannot?

I believe craft practitioners can contribute significantly to academic conferences, like the forthcoming one in Wollongong. Those who theorise about craft often tend to do so based on their observation of the completed product. The craft worker, however, is grounded in knowledge of the materials and skills required to make it and understands the media used and the time and reflection which has gone into the work.  Through this understanding of process, the craft practitioner can provide insights which may often elude a more academic theorist. 

See conference website

Fabrications: Texts and Textiles is on at Wollongong University 29 November - 1 December 2002


The opinions expressed in this article do not necessarily reflect the official policy of Craft Victoria. Please log into the online forums to discuss the content of these articles.